That's true, Albert. But Dancer also didn't mention asking if the boyfriend had a record of abuse, or tax evasion, or ate like a pig. Dancer didn't ask if the suitor had cat allergies, or backlogged dental work, or a known history of belching in public.
The scope of the column was clearly how Dancer would go about determining whether the suitor was likely to turn out to be a successful professional gambler, capable of supporting a family. Nothing more, nothing less.
--Dunbar
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <ehpee@...> wrote :
Whether you set your own hours or not is one thing, and i agree that you go and you play when the best opportunities present themselves. I just found it strange that in a scenario where marriage is being contemplated that these sort of matters would be significant, yet in the article they weren't even considered.
Regards
A.P.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: h_dunbar@hotmail.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (7) |
