I didn't say it was likely that you'd be a long term loser. I only said that there was a real chance of being a long term loser.
Go and run 100,000 simulations of 3 or 4 million hands and see if you are a winner on every last one of them. If you can do that then I will admit that I am wrong.
Regards
A.P.
From: mailto:vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 6:48 AM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA - 30 JUN 2015
That's baloney. If you play "good", and the game is "good", and you don't mistakenly equate the word "year" with "long term", then you will win. If you chose a sample of 3-4 million hands, all at the same denomination to make it a fair sample, and you stick to a game that does not have a ridiculously high variance, and you have a healthy EV like 1% or more, it is incorrect that you have a "very real chance of being a long term loser playing video poker". And there's all kinds of software that will do the figuring for you.
Unless, of course, God just doesn't like you.
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <ehpee@...> wrote :
Absolutely correct. I don't care how good you are, and how good the game is. There is still a very real chance that you will be a long term loser playing video poker.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: "Albert Pearson" <ehpee@rogers.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (12) |
