>You're absolutely right about the control factor, but I believe that that is the reason it is relevant, not because it is a quantitative factor like machine selection, skill, benefits etc. but because no matter how well you prepare there is always a chance, however slim that your long term results will not be as good as expected, there is also the chance that your results may be way better than expected. Perhaps that's why they call it gambling.
>
>Regards
>A.P.
I might have objected to the wrong statement, which I may have
confused with such statements as "I'd rather be lucky than good."
Understanding how fluctuation affects results is valuable, but I don't
see what action the statement "results are the only thing that matter"
recommends.
Posted by: 007 <007@embarqmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (23) |
