What "discussion"?
It appears to me that Bob is essentially asserting that, for the regular plays in which he engages, his ROR is near 0 and therefore bankroll considerations aren't a practical concern.
I'm willing to accept this at face value. For those who aren't, that doesn't mean that this is fodder for discussion. Both parties have to hold an interest in the topic for that to be the case. I gather Bob doesn't (his prerogative; and something I don't find unreasonable).
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <cdgnpc@...> wrote :
Well it was an interesting discussion the first few times. It would still be interesting if BD seemed to really want to be a part of this instead of getting dragged into it.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (9) |
