[vpFREE] Re: why CE is better than EV

 

Nice post! I've never seen CE (Certainty Equivalent} laid out so clearly before.

--Dunbar


---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <nightoftheiguana2000@...> wrote :

EV is an ok beginner's way to rank plays but it doesn't take into account variance and bankroll. CE takes into account EV, plus variance and bankroll:

CE = EV - variance/2xBankroll

Example:

FPDW hand: 22299

holding all five returns 15 bets

holding just 222 returns:

deuces: 46/1081 x 200 = 8.511
wrf: 40/1081 x 25 = 0.925
5k: 67/1081 x 15 = 0.930
sf: 108/1081 x 9 = 0.899
4k: 820/1081 x 5 = 3.793
total EV = 15.058

deuces: 46/1081 x (200-15.058)^2 = 1455.470
wrf: 40/1081 x (25-15.058)^2 = 3.657
5k: 67/1081 x (15-15.058)^2 = 0
sf: 108/1081 x (9-15.058)^2 = 3.667
4k: 820/1081 x (5-15.058)^2 = 76.738
total variance = 1540

solve for when CE>15:

15.058 - 1540/2xBankroll > 15
Bankroll > 13,276 bets > 16.6 royals

So, even though just holding 222 is the maxEV play, it's not a Kelly overlay unless your current bankroll exceeds 13,276 bets or 16.6 royals. Gamblers might typically play FPDW with a 5 royal bankroll, so 16.6 royals represents a much larger bankroll (more than 3x) than typical. For a quarter player, 13,276 bets is $16,595.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: h_dunbar@hotmail.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___