Ed wrote: "I promise you can't beat it long-term. It plays within 1 big blind per 1000
hands of the optimal strategy."
I think they made some calculation mistakes or they dumbed down the online bot for some reason. It doesn't take falls like the IGT bot to try to get you to keep playing but I think some of its lines become too narrow and too readable, a mistake the IGT bot also makes. Have you tried playing it? I'm not arguing that the optimal strategy would still be exploitable, I'm arguing that it's not quite optimal strategy yet, for some reason. University of Alberta hasn't published all the details, so they might be holding back for some reason, like maybe they hope to get some big stakes challenges.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
