maclarenv12 wrote: "Assuming that one was going to sit at this game and wanted to play a six hour session (with Mike Shackleford's) strategy. What would you suggest for a minimum bankroll."
Probably the best way with these hard to analyze games including regular slots, assuming you're going to play anyway, is to use the experimental method. Play for half an hour at the minimum bet and record your results, and repeat and average out your results. If the results vary widely, it will take many sessions to get a reasonable average.
For example, at Jacks or better, you should ignore any royals or straight flushes, since those are long shots. Instead focus on the quads or better, or payoffs of 25 for 1 or less for a slot. We already know the quad cycle is about 423 on a computer, so you'd need a sample size about 5 x 423 = 2115 to get some statistical significance. So, start taking real data in a casino, this is the best way, assuming you're going to play anyway, to figure out your true EV and variance in the actual casino environment on actual casino machines.
Statistics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics
Statistics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics Statistics is the study of the collection, analysis, interpretation, presentation, and organization of data.[1] In applying statistics to, e.g., a scientific, indus...
View on en.wikiped... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics
Preview by Yahoo
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (6) |
