Re: [vpFREE] Re: S.C.O.R.E for video poker

 



I don't think #3 applies. Surely, you want to be able to
play a +EV game as much as possible. But if you aren't able
to play to N0, I don't think that should be a reason to not
play. Would you bet on a coin flip with a 10% edge (pays -1
or +1.2 for heads or tails) if you could only make the bet a
few times? Would you play FPDW if you could only play 5,000
hands?

I don't think it should matter if you can get the rounds in
for a specific tax year, as long as you aren't putting
yourself in a situation where you're playing a huge variance
game (ie: 9/10 years you expect to lose $10,000 and 1/10
years you expect to win $120,000), since that's basically
the exact opposite from a loss-rebate.

______________________________

"nightoftheiguana2000 wrote:

>3. Do you think you have the time? You need to be able to
> play over Nzero (variance/edge/edge) hands in the current
> tax year. Nzero is the point where the edge equals one
> standard deviation. Less than Nzero is clearly still short
> term.

__._,_.___

Posted by: Shagatola <shagatola@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (5)

.

__,_._,___