A good column as usual Bob. However you did not make a distinction between limit and no limit Hold'em. In no limit Hold'em you will find the better players. If you can win at $20-$40 limit Hold'em does not mean you will crush $1-$2 limit Hold'em, in fact you will probably be a loser. Sure the players are much worse but a typical casino rake of $4 per hand will destroy anybody. There may not be anybody in the world that can beat $1-$2 limit Hold'em and if that rare person exists that can it would be a total waste of their talent making less than $6 per hour. Now you are right to say that if someone can win at $20-$40 no limit Hold'em he will destroy $1-$2 no limit Hold'em. On the video poker scene I am getting to old to play (59 later this year). I will not play video poker where I can get W2G's if I am getting Medicare. Is it FPDW progressive for me leaving at $1200 or more progressive? I hope not, the dollars are too little for me. Oh how I will fall down in class - from hundreds of thousands of dollars of W2G's per year to zero! Advice to all young video poker players - get annuitized early and quit (certainly quit if you're getting Medicare). My prediction, not many people are going to listen to me even though I am almost always right. An example in the casinos when I see a person take a cash advance I will tell that person not to take that cash advance to gamble. You are paying a cash advance fee to lose money gambling. Those that understand what I'm saying will agree with me and take the cash advance anyway. I have not had one person agree with me and not take the cash advance because of what I told him (her). It might be table poker only for me in a few years. Of course if I'm annuitized no gambling (yeah) is in my future.
Sent from my iPhone
Posted by: nordo123@aol.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (4) |
