bl ... I've taken to heart Jean's recent advice to report total w-2g's as gross winnings, and back into an appropriate loss number that gets to your actual net win. Presumably offered in consultation with Marissa Chien, EA, I take it as a strong sign that a "netting" methodology yields a losing battle with the IRS.
Were it not for real-life consequences (tax implications), I'd be tempted to tilt with the IRS over this for sport. And when they insist that that all wins must be reported gross, amend my return to show a TRUE gross win (coin-in +/- net loss/win) ... suggesting that their literal vice means reporting all $6+ mil in machine wins last year (offset with a sched A deduction of near equivalent coin-in as "loss")
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <bornloser1537@...> wrote :
>the session method will help lower their reportable winnings.
Not to beat a dead horse (OK, maybe I am <smile>), but how many have successfully been able to argue with the IRS that their "winnings", using the session method, are less than their W2-G total?
I am not talking about individuals who file as a professional using Schedule C.
..... bl
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (14) |
