nightoftheiguana wrote:
>the optimal strategy is dependent on the total environment of the game, computer perfect in vitro maxEV may be a place to start, but quite likely it is not the optimal strategy in vivo.
Another advantage of at least heading toward min-cost from max-EV is
that usually it involves less variance. I'm surprised the phrase
"Kelly expected value" isn't more popular. I'd like to see a video
poker analyzer that allows for the logarithmic value of each hand to
be evaluated, so that what bankroll it takes to, say, keep 3 aces over
a full house in Double Bonus, according to the Kelly Criterion, could
be easily seen.
__._,_.___
Posted by: 007 <007@embarqmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (8) |
.
__,_._,___
