You got me wrong on that one. I was being my usual sarcastic self, but my ire was aimed at the casinos or whoever it is that is encouraging this action. I'd be guessing that it is the casino bean counters that are promoting this, as their usual reaction to poor business is always to pull back instead of promote more play.
A.P.
________________________________
From: "Bob Dancer bobdancervp@hotmail.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
To: "vpfree@yahoogroups.com" <vpfree@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] Proposition 3 on the Nevada Ballot affects Video Poker Players Big Time
AP wrote: How to get rid of the pros
in one easy step, no more need to bar or no mail, just tax them to death.
It's always nice to get a warm, sensitive response from
Albert!
Kidding aside, this actually will be really bad news for
Nevada casinos and players of all levels. Of the players to get $1 million or more in W2Gs here, a
relatively small percentage of them are successful pros. Adding a $20,000 tax
per million dollars of W2Gs will cause many players to play elsewhere. Which
will be a BIG revenue loss for the casinos. They make LOTS of money off of players who get a lot of W2Gs.
If casinos are losing money, you can expect a trickle-down
effect to all games. The pay schedules here, even for quarters, will become
like they are in other states --- typically less than 98%. This proposition
does not only affect big players. It does not only affect pros. If affects all of us.
Apparently I mislabeled this. It's Proposition 3A --- not Proposition 3.
Bob
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/V/Links.htm
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: Albert Pearson <ehpee@rogers.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (4) |
