IMO, there was clear informational value in Bob's posting that he was in the tournament. If you're in the tournament, you are in a position to verify that the tournament was run as advertised.
You might argue that an analysis doesn't depend on whether the tournament actually happened, but I'm going to be much more interested in an analysis if it applies to a real situation that either has happened or I think is about to happen.
--Dunbar
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <ehpee@...> wrote :
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <ehpee@...> wrote :
In my first note regarding the column I mentioned that the results were irrelevant. In his reply to the other post where he says why do you care. I thought it would be obvious why people care and that is why I made my patronizing response. Like I also said in that post it was not germane to the article to mention that he was in the tournament. One could make all the relevant points without mentioning that you were entered in the tournament.
I will bet you dollars to doughnuts that if he had won he would have mentioned it.
A.P.
__._,_.___
Posted by: h_dunbar@hotmail.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (13) |
.
__,_._,___
