I suppose you might argue, noti, that this strategy is applicable for somewhere with the rep of Atlantis in Reno. Still, a better strategy might be, "why bother to play there in the first place?"
In any case, the "Atlantis' " tend to represent a nominal portion of an active player's play ,,, so while I consider your observation "fair", it's marginal in significance.
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <nightoftheiguana2000@...> wrote :
007 wrote: "There was a team a few decades ago that locked up many progressives
they played and the progressives had huge meter movement. I estimated
their "max-EV" strategy cost them 5 figures per year."
A similar idea to think about: say there is a casino with a juicy mailer but they no mail you as soon as you get a royal. Clearly the min-royal strategy (not maxEV) would get the most money in that case.
they played and the progressives had huge meter movement. I estimated
their "max-EV" strategy cost them 5 figures per year."
A similar idea to think about: say there is a casino with a juicy mailer but they no mail you as soon as you get a royal. Clearly the min-royal strategy (not maxEV) would get the most money in that case.
__._,_.___
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (17) |
.
__,_._,___
