vp_wiz wrote: "However, it's my experience that reasonable opportunities for alternate strategy play (of significant magnitude) are few and far between formosr typical players."
The "typical player" (if there even is such a thing) probably underestimates the bankroll and time requirements needed to grind out a reasonable portion of the theoretical EV. These people would be better served by the Kelly system and min-cost strategies for progressives, imho. MaxEV is really only for those with substantial bankrolls and substantial playing plans (like over 2000 hours/year at at least 1000 HPH for video poker). As a general rule. There are always exceptions, there are always plays with juicy edges and low variance where MaxEV likely applies even for those with modest bankroll and playing plans. But as a general rule I think it would be a mistake to just assume MaxEV is the best fit, especially in today's environment of tighter and tighter games.
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (8) |
