On Jun 20, 2014, at 1:55 PM, "nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
While the N0 for flatbetting blackjack is low, for card counting and spread betting, it is not.
For a team that is under N0 (1/3 negative results due to chance alone), statistically one would expect the middle third to be +1EV, the bottom third to be -1EV, and the top third to be +3EV, for a net +1EV mean. Colin said his middle third broke even, which leads me to suspect the middle and top third were skimming an EV, so their results were 0 for the middle and only +2EV for the top third, for a net +1/3 EV. Ironically blame was probably placed on the losing bottom third when in reality they were probably the most honest group. Now, someone might say this is a Church Team, aren't Church Team's highly ethical? My observations lead me to believe that Church Team's are the least ethical.
World Game Protection Conference Presentation (The Surveillance Conference)
Posted by: funny.young.guy@gmail.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (2) |
