> You're assuming that the casino will pay you for the triple play dealt
> royal progressive when you have actually drawn three royals instead of
> having them dealt.
>
> I believe I have heard of someone actually doing this, but I can't
> remember if the casino agreed to pay them the dealt progressive instead
> of the three individual progressives or not. I'd love to test it myself.
You may have been thinking of this message from 2009:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/message/102838
"In 2007 at the SunCoast, I was playing a triple-play progressive and was dealt 4
to the royal. The Q came in on all three lines. They paid me for the dealt
not the three individual lines because their signs state "all three lines"
instead of dealt."
I would not be at all surprised to learn that the result depends on the casino and the wording on the progressive display (but if you made me guess, my impression is that most progressives like this say "all lines" -- the chance of it coming up is small enough, and this way they avoid any arguments/litigation, and it's not their money anyway, so it seems like the path of least resistance for the casino)
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (8) |
