Check out < http://nyr.kr/dUGG1G >
On Friday, November 8, 2013 12:11 AM, Chinzie <chinzie21@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yep, some people believe the selection process is really important or a matter of bad luck that they don't win. Come on...you telling me that computers can't be programmed to where one selection is made to then show the other 'would-be' selections to have won? Fact that the total matrix is revealed after the player has made their picks, prove nothing. Only a fool would believe these are fair. In Reno they now have a game at GSR where you play tic-tac-toe against a live chicken by making your pick on a computer. Only thing is you can't see what the chicken is actually picking. How many times has the chicken lost? None, to my understanding...best you can do is tie. You don't have a chance against a computer and if/and when someone beats that chicken and wins $10K, it will be because GSR wanted that person to win.
Now, if it is spin on a slot or a hand pick selection from a hopper, those are much more difficult to cheat...not saying that they can't cheat on those, just a little more creative thought process would need to prevail in order to do so.
On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:15 AM, <haaljo@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Wizard has discussed slot machines with regards to similar inference.My anecdotal evidence is with "quick strikes" and the "free game" bonus round matrix.The total matrix is revealed after the player has made their picks.A close family member berates a certain individual as the latter does not make careful choices during # picks.The latter explains to their lovely close family member that.the game's "win" is determined at the pushing of the bet (deal) button. The former does not believe this is true and wise choices are necessary.Who's right?(Side note: 3% of our action/trip is on slot machines mostly quick strike. Attempt to stay under radar.)
---In vpfree@yahoogroups.com, <007@...> wrote:The Wizard of Odds wrote about a similar issue about Bingo
progressives at Station Casinos. According to him, the Gaming
Commission wasn't interested in the fact that their progressive Bingo
cards weren't "fair." I can vouch for the fact that there are other
Bingo progressives that still have this characteristic.
you wrote:
>I took it as serious because this casino practice bugs me, too. The implication is that if you'd only chosen one of the other icons, you'd have won much more. Someone who does not frequently play these games could easily think that those values were real. Seems like fraud to me.
>
>
> --Dunbar
>
>
>---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <chinzie21@...> wrote:
>
> Tell me this isn't a serious post.
>
>
> On Nov 6, 2013, at 1:38 PM, <glee4ever@... mailto:glee4ever@...> wrote:
>
> Third attempt to post. Hate new format!
>
>
>
>
> Whenever I play the kiosk prize games, no matter what I hit, I usually get the lowest or next to lowest if there are more than 3 prizes. Even with only 3 choices, NEVER get the $1000 cash or truck or such. Is the game rigged so you get what casino has decided in advance? Is this fair? Should gaming commission look into it? Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (7) |
.
__,_._,___
