So you're saying the casino "forgot" to remove the hi-limit slots even though they strategically removed the hi-limit vp machines....so as a sure thing/easy money/all-balls fix, they chose to ban those who played them and knowingly accepted the coming lawsuits from all these "on the up & up" anonymous, but now legendary, players?
It sure is baffling that someone wants to bet $1k on hearsay and anonymous postings from the Internet. How will a winner be determined? Seems to me we'd have to wait for the hearing and Revel has to ADMIT to doing that to players with real names.
----- Reply message -----
From: "Mickey" <mickeycrimm@yahoo.com>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 9 JUL 2013
Date: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 3:38 pm
It was reported in the WoV thread early on that in the first couple of days of the promotion players who were hammering the $25 slots and the one $100 slot were being disqualified from the promotion. I suspect these are the people who are going to sue. There is no way to manipulate the card on those slots. And I suspect that these players were the sharpest, biggest bankrolled players in the house, and had enough moxie to stay away from card manipulation.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (6) |
