Totally agree that slot managers need to do more. From what I have seen in casinos currently, casinos are generally treating this game very similarly to "Ultimate X". Many casinos have not bothered to up Ultimate X paytables much beyond 8/5 DDB from what I have personally seen. But unlike Ultimate X, the "multiplier hook" of "Winning Streak" is not nearly as strong as Ultimate X, in my opinion. Tons of people love Ultimate X even at 8/5 DDB or worse because of the "12X miracle". Every time I walk by "Winning Streak Poker" it's pretty empty.
Also Dave "haaljo" wrote this:
Did notice it took awhile for the different games to load. Something you used to see 20 years ago.
Personally this annoyed the crap out of me as well, because it took minutes to compare paytables on these WMS units when I tried to.
If slot managers want players to play these games regularly, they need to up the base tables a couple of units. Many VP "addicts" are aware that paytables matter in their state, so they will remain at the better ones, unless the game has a very good "hook".
> Of course, any slot manager worth his salt should recognize that implicit spread between optimal returns on the game and likely player actual returns and look to strengthen paytables to entice. (I've yet to encounter a slot manager "worth his salt".)
>
> - H.
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Douglas V" <tringlomane@> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, even though this game may be more simply described as "Multi-Strike in reverse", it's not exactly the same because now hands with varying payoffs that move up the multiplier ladder, so your strategy directly depends on those hands' values and their current multiplier ...
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (11) |
