So where does adoption of new rules, that enhance Revel's position, fall? For example, eliminating FSP use on video poker (or at least on machines with more liberal paytables).
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Bob Dancer <bobdancervp@...> wrote:
>
> On last week's Gambling with an Edge"
> radio show, co-host Richard Munchkin and I made a $200 bet as to
> whether Revel would honor the terms of the up-to-$100,000 loss rebate
> promotion. We're expecting worsening pay tables and expecting players to
> be thrown out for violating rules --- such as playing on someone else's
> card. We're looking for other things.
>
>
> But if they renege on payments or throw out players who didn't
> violate the rules, then Richard would win the bet and I would lose. If
> they honor the promotion as advertised, I win the bet.
>
> The "honoring matchplay"
> part of their promotion is not part of the bet.
>
> Neither Richard
> nor I are flying to AC to take advantage of this promotion but we
> suspect many vpFREE members are --- or are active on the AC vpFREE
> discussion group. So if Revel reneges, please post it here.
>
> Bob
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (4) |
