If the casinos had spent as much as the banks on having politicians craft laws protecting their industry as the banks - yes this would be the same situation, but casinos are not protected like banks.
He did not manipulate the game he found a pattern and used that. Is this cheating - I don't think so, but it is debatable.
Would anyone call this hypothetical story cheating:After being dealt a pair of red kings on job, threw them by accident. The next hand was a dealt 4ok. It turned out that about 1/3rd of the time after throwing a pair of red kings and only red kings that the next hand dealt on that machine regardless of changing denomination and game was a dealt 4ok. If you found that this was a universal pattern - is it cheating and would you exploit it whether you thought it was cheating or not?
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: rob.singer1111@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 12:57:10 -0700
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Check out DailyTech - Man May be Sent to Prison for Exploiting Firmware Bug i
The guy cheated the casinos. His original bets would have never been able to win the amounts he took. If he had an error in his favor at his bank because of a computer glitch and took the money, he'd be required by law to return it. This is not taking advantage of a casino game like card counting is. And what kind of attorney would defend such a creep?
Prison awaits.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (7) |
