100% condemnation and 0% logic doesn't make a good argument. You can see from my posts I don't think he did anything wrong. Calling him scum or my argument horrible doesn't support your case at all.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Steve Norden <Nordo123@...> wrote:
>
>
> a horrible rationalization, vpplayer88. a good gambler who finds multipliers on ultimate x did not cause
> the bad gambler to quit with an active multiplier. do you understand this 'scammer' LIED to the player
> with a promise of riches and had the player play with negative expectancy, and quit with postive expectancy.
> This 'scammer' and others like him are liers and the scum of the earth. it would not surprise me if he was
> also a cheater. i hope he burns in, well you know where.
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (33) |
