Ug, if you can't see the difference is that I get killed too when I interfere, then I don't know what to say.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "johnnyzee48127" <greeklandjohnny@...> wrote:
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpplayer88" <vpplayer88@> wrote:
> >
> > 100% condemnation and 0% logic doesn't make a good argument. You can see from my posts I don't think he did anything wrong. Calling him scum or my argument horrible doesn't support your case at all.
> >
>
> The crux of the disagreement is that you view causing an event and observing an event is the same thing and no one else makes these 2 equal.
>
> If you observe someone beating someone else to death and you don't help, that is way different that beating that person to death yourself. If your arguement is that either way the person is dead so they must be equal, then does it follow that any time 2 actions have the same outcome, they are equivalent? I don't see how that makes any sense.
>
> I haven't seen the logic in your statement yet. Maybe you state what your definition of 'morally equivalent' means. Also, you might want to define what you mean by moral. I think we are using different definitions.
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (36) |
