Harry wrote: I'm surprised that in Bob's discussion of the "power of the pack", that the relationship to possible straights (incl SF's, and in the case of the DW 5K vs 3W hold, WRF's) that might be formed on the draw didn't enter into the picture.
Hmm . . . I thought I did (assuming it was your turn to mis-type when you spoke of straights including three deuces --- although I'm ahead because my mistake was bigger than your mistake!)My phrase of "(Even though it
doesn't change the play, the value of drawing to three deuces is quite a bit
higher from W W W 3♥ 3♣ and W W W 6♥ 6♣). " was all about that very concept --- although by that time in the article I didn't think it was necessary to completely spell it out. While there will always be players whose eyes glaze over at this kind of article, I thought that anybody still following the discussion would be able to connect the dots by that point.Is this what you're talking about Harry or am I missing your point?Bob
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 2 OCT 2012
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___