I think I explained , in a previous memo, how easy it would be to write
computer software that did a 12% hold , yet looked random. I'm going to
guess that its the old bait and switch. It may be fair now, but a quick
switch of the ROM's and all of a sudden, everybodys on a losing streak and
you give it all back blaming it on short term luck !
----- Original Message -----
From: <lfcmja@verizon.net>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 11:36 AM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Aqueduct Racino N.Y. Baccarrat games Random...Might
be..
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "eecounter" <eecounter@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja@" <lfcmja@> wrote:
>> >
>> > Was in the neighborhood so I stopped in for my second visit to explore
>> > the
>> > bac.game>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>> Based on your description, I would say that these games are likely
>> random. It sounds like each station has multiple player spots available
>> for betting on the same outcome - just like a regular bac. game. Since
>> the players have the option of betting either Player or Banker, and since
>> there will presumably be some players betting on Player and some on
>> Banker at the same time, any intentional non-random bias that hurts one
>> side helps the other, so it's hard for the casino to gain anything that
>> way. Also, any intentional non-random bias in this game might be
>> potentially exploitable by observant players. It seems that it would be
>> much more simple and safer for the casino just to deal an honest game and
>> let the built in odds (or commission charge for the Banker) take care of
>> the results.
>>
>> EE
>
