--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "gofastnismo" <gofastnismo@...> wrote:
>
> Well, full pay vp is not an option for those wanting to have a nice vacation on the strip especially at LOWER denominations. I dont think most wives would want to spend the day at Casino Royale or Circus Circus for a better pay schedule rather than playing in the luxurious resort casinos such as Bellagio, Palazzo or Wynn. I, being a local, have the option to go hunt down good plays without my significant other. She also prefers nicer places but knows the difference in pay schedules can make a big difference. I dont fault visitors for playing poorer pay schedules. Sometimes its just about having a good time. This also goes with playing in other states that have no full pay poker, period!
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja@" <lfcmja@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "caplatinum" <belairgold@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bellagio is short pay you got lucky. MGM has short pay too for those that don't mind playing against 4% and higher vigs
> >
> > Correct but unfortunately it is these players that are growing innumbers on this board and on others. Look at the jackpot pictures !
> > They're promoting VP downgrades.
> >
> > LF
I am of the opinion that we need people who are willing to play short pay machines.
Here is a hypothetical situation for you. What if EVERYONE was an aspiring advantage player and would only play full pay machines at near expert level? If I had to guess, I'd say the casinos would simply no longer offer video poker.
I believe bad players need to exist for the gambling eco system to thrive.
> >
>
