I cannot access the link you provided, nor can I find any section of vpFREE entitled faq. How do I get to the info on NO exactly???
~FK
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "dunbar_dra" <h_dunbar@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone out there remember where the technical definition of "Long Term" for video poker is sequestered? I remember the content and that it was the number of hands required to have a 99% chance of being within + or - 1% of expectancy, but I can't seem to find it now.
> >
> > ~FK
> >
>
> Perhaps you're remembering a discussion about longterm at this link:
>
> http://members.cox.net/vpfree/FAQ_LT.htm
>
> ...especially the part posted by John G. Zaroff part way down the page. Zaroff credits TomSki with calculating how many hands it would take to have a 95% chance of being within 1% of EV.
>
> That's an interesting measure, but I don't think either Zaroff or TomSki meant for that to be an official technical definition of long term.
>
> --Dunbar
>
