--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, kellypkjoe <kellypkjoe@...> wrote:
>
> I imagine someone in legal found out and had them removed. I lived Jn when the law was debated and passed. The church's appossed the passage and insisted on no 100% machines. I was in politics at the time was well aware as well as the story was front page news in the papers and TV. Check and see if the laws was changed>
>
I've always wondered about this. Sure, I've heard the same thing about no 100% machines being allowed by law, but I've never seen such a law in print, and I've always wonder wtf do they care? Why would anyone, any legislator, or anyone with any input as to the pending legislation, be concerned about 100% games? As far as that goes, why would they even know about it? I just can't picture a bunch of legislators sitting around and discussing, "Hey, yeah, let's go ahead and authorize this casino, but none of those full pay deuces games, we're not going to have any of that nonsense." Why would the issue even come up?
