Actually its much simpler than that. Anyone that has a bankroll that large wouldn't be wasting their time on this small forum. Even the best Vp players dont have 5 million dollar bankrolls they can piss away. Bob Dancer admitted not having the bankroll for his wife's $100 Vp hit. They took a potshot at it.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "seedub49" <seedub49@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rob.singer1111" <rob.singer1111@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So if the play was worth about $3/hand, then why were't people talking about
>
> Because if someone knew about it and had the bankroll to play it, they would have been busy trying to hit it. And I don't know anyone with the knowledge and bankroll to try it that would decide to tell everyone in a public forum to get the word out so that they have more competiton.
>
> >If the bankroll issue comes up, we've already seen where the bankroll even for quarter players at the M was way too high for most but they still played them.
>
> While a lot of people play above their bankroll, a lot don't realize that they are. Most people are readily aware that they don't have the bankroll for a $100 machine, but think they have the bankroll for a quarter machine even if they don't.
>
> >I'm not sure why the high-rollers here just let some high-stakes poker player scoop up this .65%+++ jackpot right before their eyes.
>
> I'm guessing they didn't all have a meeting and decide to "just let some high-stakes poker player scoop" it up. Odds are better that most weren't aware of it. Aria had backed off quite a few high-rollers and took away the player's club account of some others after a promo that gave .77% back in freeplay (and about another .073% in holiday gift point freeplay) with the added equity of a pretty substantial drawing city-wide. Not bad considering you could play 9/6 jacks for up to $1250 a hand if you wanted.
>
