--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Barry Glazer <b.glazer@...> wrote:
>It is likely true that there is less to make the casino suspicious that one is an advantage player when one plays VP and is not winning, but I fail to see the logic in saying that being trespassed, even when ahead, is a player advantage -- if that were true, wouldn't the casino NOT trespass players, but instead let them stay so that the casino can realize it's edge (oh, wait, the casino doesn't have an edge in this case).
1. Just because someone is winning, doesn't mean they have a long term edge.
2. Just because someone is playing a theoretically positive machine, doesn't mean they have a long term edge.
3. Casinos should not trespass players just for winning, but they do. When they trespass a winner who would otherwise lose in the long term, that is a casino disadvantage and a player advantage. From my limited observations, it's not the pros who get trespassed (they are smart enough to figure ways around such problems), it's mostly gamblers that the casinos would beat in the long term.
