I should have mentioned: I plan to live forever, and I'm willing to die trying.
Or I could say I really meant to say "in-finite", which of course means "very finite"...you know like when you add "in" to "flammable" and get "inflammable", which means "very flammable".
Optionally, I could admit I was wrong. This seemed funnier.
Anyway, someone should answer the original question seriously. I would, but I really don't know negative expectancy calculations.
~FK
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Rick E. Percy" <ricke.percy@...> wrote: Frank, If in the absence of positive machines you would not play, the answer is you are likely able to play zero days, not an infinite number. You may never lose your bankroll in this situation and you may theoretically go a great number of days without playing if that were the question, but I would have to consult an actuarial table to determine the likely number of days that you could go without playing. I suspect it would be a fair bit below infinity.
Happy to help with the higher math.
