Have to agree with the Mickenator here.
At the Suncoast, nobody was working a machine that
they knowingly were exploiting a flaw. Nobody was
doing anything dishonest or tricky.
I still don't get why a Casino, if they honestly think
(how can 5X points ruin their bottom line) you have
to go for their financial help, should give you a name
tag and make you an honorary slot host and put
your picture on the wall.
BANNED FROM the SAHARA VP Room!
[Your Name Here]
What message would that send to the playes?
The Casino is HONEST
The Casino is FUN
the Casino can be BEATEN
I'm also guessing that if your relatives from out
of town come to Las Vegas, they would want
to see your photo on their BANNED Hall of Fame.
I want my 86'D T-shirt from Bob Stupak's ghost.
So not only does this non-Attorney think Mickey
is right on from a legal, Constitutional and moral
perspective, but from a financial and business one.
--- On Sat, 3/19/11, Mickey <mickeycrimm@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Mickey <mickeycrimm@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Want some publicity about the Suncoast debacle??
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 19, 2011, 6:35 AM
Sour grapes is not the issue. Advantage play is not the issue. This is the issue: Does the right to refuse service give casino personnel carte blanche to trample on the civil rights of United States citizens?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
