[vpFREE] Re: Twas The Night Before New Years

 



We have a skeptic in our midst. First, let me say I advocate skepticism strongly. My Father used to say, "believe only half of what you see and none of what your hear." I took it to heart. I can hardly fault you for being like me.

Here though, your doubt is misplaced. We don't want your money and we aren't trying to sell you anything.

I don't know Mickey personally, and in fact I was totally separate from the independent pros that he hung with. We were not friends, if anything we were enemies. So consider me as outside a source as you can get.

I can confirm almost everything he has said, in every post he has ever made. And the ones I have no knowledge of, still ring true to the best of my own personal experience.

I could have half a dozen pros I know confirm all my stories, not the least of which would be Bob Dancer, Jean Scott, and Dan Paymar. The three major authors in the VP biz today.

But other than a large number of independent conformations from multiple sources, how does one really prove anything that happens to them in the course of a normal day...unless they are on a reality TV show.

Look, here's the real truth of it, far too many outrageous things happen in the world of pro gambling, on a nearly daily basis, to necessitate making up anything. The truth is interesting enough.

If you would still like proof of a particular story, let me know and I'll have some of the other witnesses email you. Really though you should reserve your skepticism for campaign promises and that your car's insurance policy will actually cover anything that breaks regularly.

~A man with one watch knows the time. A man with two is never sure.

~Happy New Year

~Frank Kneeland, Author of The Secret World of Video Poker Progressives--A History and How-To of Video Poker Slot Teams in Las Vegas. www.progressivevp.com

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "jim_mason7" <7711-jimmason@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Guys-it is all very amusing- but very hard to believe.
> A little proof, not anecdotes would be more convincing.
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___