Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 16 DEC 2014

 

<smile> I like Dunbar's adage (or is it Shackleford's?). It seems a good explanation to Dancer's play.

It is not whether you win or lose, it is whether it is a good bet.

..... bl

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: bornloser1537@yahoo.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (8)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 16 DEC 2014

 

I think they call it gambling!

--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 12/17/14, Albert Pearson ehpee@rogers.com [vpFREE] <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 16 DEC 2014
To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Received: Wednesday, December 17, 2014, 7:59 AM


That is what caused me to raise my question. If you
aren't going to complete the cycle, which would give you
the expected return, then why play it ?




.







__._,_.___
Posted by: BLavoie <blavoie46@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (7)

.

__,_._,___
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)