Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 10 JUL 2012

 

Bob Dancer wrote, "I didn't say there was essentially no risk involved."

Perhaps you didn't say those exact words. But, you certainly did imply it.

~Luke

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Bob Dancer <bobdancervp@hotmail.com> wrote:

> ST wrote: Bob: You as a gambler are in the risk/reward business and the
> risk to you is much different than it would be to most other people. So
> before you go telling people their is essentially no risk involved in
> using an electronic device to gain an advantage checking a strategy while
> playing, why don't you consider their potential risks and not just look at
> it based on your own.
>
> I didn't say there was essentially no risk involved. What I said is that
> this law has never been enforced to my knowledge. For the record, I have
> no plans on doing a risk/reward study for everybody on vpFREE simply
> because ST says I should consider this. Bob

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

RE: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 10 JUL 2012

 


ST wrote: Bob: You as a gambler are in the risk/reward business and the risk to you is much different than it would be to most other people. So before you go telling people their is essentially no risk involved in using an electronic device to gain an advantage checking a strategy while playing, why don't you consider their potential risks and not just look at it based on your own.

I didn't say there was essentially no risk involved. What I said is that this law has never been enforced to my knowledge. For the record, I have no plans on doing a risk/reward study for everybody on vpFREE simply because ST says I should consider this. Bob

.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___