--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mike" <melbedewy1226@...> wrote:
>
>
> You missed his point.
> If a team hits a jackpot every dime of the jackpot walks out the door.
> If Debbie Des Moines or Lorrie Local hits the jackpot there is an exponentially higher chance that money will be lost at the casino-either that day or in subsequent visits.
> That is the other main reason, other than pure spite, why those huge meter progressives and Piggy Banking games are forever gone.
>
Good point, but you are assuming the team never comes back. If that casino has a healthy lineup of good progressives, they'll be back. And they'll give more action than Debbie.
I understand where you're coming from, though, and I personally wouldn't even want to be part of a team, and I personally don't see why anyone needs to be in a team. If you're bankrolled enough, as you should be, then who gives a darn about variance? I would much rather work alone, and the only reason for working with anyone else would be to share information from scouting. Very few people would I trust to split wins with and share bankroll. It's not worth the headache, in my opinion.
[vpFREE] Re: Casinos Tolerate Teams?
[vpFREE] Re: Casinos Tolerate Teams?
You missed his point.
If a team hits a jackpot every dime of the jackpot walks out the door.
If Debbie Des Moines or Lorrie Local hits the jackpot there is an exponentially higher chance that money will be lost at the casino-either that day or in subsequent visits.
That is the other main reason, other than pure spite, why those huge meter progressives and Piggy Banking games are forever gone.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bobbartop" <bobbartop@...> wrote:
>
> ---
>
> The large jackpot that is banked, has to eventually go to a player, so it's not the casino's money. The casino still profits on the subsequent action. Teams give a lot of action, when the jackpot is big enough. The casinos don't make anything off a machine that sits idle.
>