[vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's Response

 

Barry wrote: "...is what they do in Nevada, like it or not - and the state law permits "trespassing" for any reason. In a state heavily financed by casino tax money, we are not likely ever to succeed in getting the law changed, or in persuading casinos not to take advantage of it."

Actually, the court of North Las Vegas has already determined that the law does not allow trespassing law abiding citizens. It's just a matter of time before the State Supreme Court makes the same determination. Bob Nersesian is looking for just the right case. Give him a call if you think you have one.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (3)

.

__,_._,___

RE: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA - 1 DEC 2015

 

Ken wrote: "The[y] should target the high stakes advantage gamblers! Sorry Bob. At paytables of .25 and less they will never get burnt because of the low jackpots..."

The problem with low denomination machines is the comp hustling, not everyone can play video poker at computer perfect levels, but just about everyone knows they should try to extract as much from the casino as possible and keep asking until they get a yes. The "resort casinos" have too many "amenities" and can't win enough from the low denomination machines to cover costs. Low denomination machines are of course fine at the airport and other low overhead casinos.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (9)

.

__,_._,___
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)