[vpFREE] Re: SP vs. The M. Was: New Game Suggestion for FrankNBobs

 

I'm not going to lay out all the math but suffice to say if you play the dollar progressive at 1000 hands an hour for 72 hours without a royal you are likely to be down a little north of 20 grand.
Not really a great vacation at least for me. I'll stick to quarter FPDW, play leisurely and yes I will have a cocktail thank you very much.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "cheryl10jqka" <cheryl.mohme@...> wrote:
>
> What would a realistic bankroll be for 72 hrs play on those progs? And what is the real expected result after that amount of time? To hit one of the royals? For that amount of investment what are you going for? I am still learning about how the math works on these.
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rob.singer1111" <rob.singer1111@> wrote:
> >
> > Not too shabby, of course. But she lost--as most people will who play these progressives, especially those who just drop in for a quick shot at them. If you don't have all day and night today, tomorrow and the next day with a $20,000 bankroll for quarters only, you're just going to be a major part of building the progressive jackpots for those who do.
> >
> >
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Bartop" <bobbartop@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, patricia swenson <jackessiebabe@>
> > > >  
> > > > We sat at three adjacent machines, each of us playing .25c 7/5JOB, with a $2995 RF meter. 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The game itself worth 1.5%, plus .3% cashback, plus whatever bounceback.
> > >
> > > At least $20 an hour. Not too shabby.
> > >
> >
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: SP vs. The M. Was: New Game Suggestion for FrankNBobs

 

Id say 99% of the people dont gamble for a living on this board and dont have never ending bankrolls. This makes short term play a big deal. Most people want to play not ride a progressive for days on end trying to get the mathematical payback. If you cant understand this than your not as smart as you think you are Bob. The math doesn't always work and there have been pros that have busted. If you want to talk balls go play $5-10k a hand on Pai Gow or baccarat. Maybe a $20k buy in on an Omaha game. Taking a shot at 25 cent or a dollar progressive has nothing to do with balls.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Bartop" <bobbartop@...> wrote:
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mike" <melbedewy1226@> wrote:
> >
> > Given that mentality one would be "happy" if they lost all their worldy possessions playing $100 10/7 DB mathematically correctly.
> > Not me. I'll stick to slow playing FPDW -with one eye ALWAYS on alert for the cocktail girl.
> >
>
>
> And thanks, Mike, for deliberately twisting my point.
>
> But really, if all someone is concerned with is having a good time or surviving a short-term "shot", then why not gamb00l up?! There's no right and wrong to this matter. To each his own. But all this talk about having a smoother ride is tantamount to being a nit. There used to be a saying at the poker table when I was a young man. "No balls, no blue chips!"
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___