[vpFREE] Re: The New Progressives At The M

 

3 Royals hit today that I'm aware of.

$2,300 Double Bonus
$4,300 Joker KoB
$4,100 Super Double Bonus

Leaving the highest meter at a sad pathetic $3,600. Yes that is sarcasm.

No, I don't remember the game I was very tired when I left.

~FK

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "chicken2692002" <melbedewy1226@...> wrote:
>
> What's the highest quarter progressive now?
> In dollar amounts please not percent.
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@> wrote:
> >
> > I applaud your concern for others well being, it is a trait we share. And I'm very very glad you now understand where the M got their numbers for the sign.
> >
> > Just one person getting it makes all my time on vpFREE seem worth it.
> >
> > Very Good luck to you.
> >
> > ~FK
> >
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "the7thwarrior" <Judy@> wrote: You are right, I am wrong. I never thought anyone would play these games. The sign is misleading though. THe small "up to" is ridiculous. Why don't they just say what the Royal is at, and say Progressive Quarter Royal now over $$$$$? OVER 103% return?
> > >
> > > It is now obvious I was mistaken. People will play any paytable it seems for a chance at a big jackpot.
> > >
> > > I never thought the quarter Royal would get over $4000.
> > >
> > > I DID expect not everyone would play the highest meter.
> > >
> > > Ploppers have their favorite games, and that is what they bare going to play, pay tables be damned.
> > >
> > > I just hate to see people lose their bankroll, chasing the Royal. I don't think it is good for the overall M structure. Thinking of a casino as where I always lose, is not good for business.
> > > Ploppers and the general public think that way. Losing quickly is not good for overall business. But maybe I am wrong there as well, and people was to win or lose fairly quickly.
> > >
> > > I am amazed you played for 5 hours on $100. I just see people feeding money into the games. Obviously you know this game far better than the average folk and can maintain quite well over long periods of time.
> >
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: The New Progressives At The M

 

The entire story of what went down with the IRS is very long. Perhaps a 2000+ word article.

I'm sorry I just don't have the time right now to go into details.

Ask me about it when we do the interview.

~FK

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Rob Singer <rob.singer1111@...> wrote:
>
> Love the sword-fighting! :)
>  
> I seem to remember a chap named Elliott Shapiro, who told me in the early to mid-2000's in person that his job was playing on teams that almost exclusively chased progressives. I believe another named Tom Robertson led one of those teams.
>  
> Could you please explain how the IRS had anything to do with putting teams (at least the ones you're familiar with) out of business? From what I know about how they operate that's somewhat out of their circle of responsibility. Or did you mean that the confusion and complications from how individual players reported their income (or didn't report income) just caused too much trouble for it to be worth doing any more?
>  
> Thank you.
>
>
> From: Frank <frank@...>
> To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 1:53 AM
> Subject: [vpFREE] Re: The New Progressives At The M
>
> There are no more teams since the late 90's. IRS pressure put them out of business. Those of us that went independent are banging away as much as we can, I was away for the weekend sword fighting in California, but play 5 hours tonight.
>
> Also, many of the ex-team people don't play quarters. Not worth their time. If the dollar was up that would be another story.
>
> My three day absence has left too many posts to reply to. I need to get to sleep so I can be back at the M in the morning. See ya all there.
>
> Oh bring a SDB strategy for when the Joker falls.
>
> ~FK
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)