Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:
> In November 2009, I was playing at the Suncoast to maintain my mailer. I was approached by a supervisor and security and was told that I was not allowed to play video poker there, any more.
. . .
> In January 2010, I was there and asked for a room comp. That I was still getting invitations from them was one reason I felt free to do this in spite of what I had been told in November and I had been there several times in the meantime, so I was totally surprised by what then happened. Security surrounded me. I was asked if I had been 86ed. I said I hadn't been. This conversation was repeated a few times. I finally volunteered the information that in November, I had been told not to play video poker machines. He responded "so you HAVE been 86ed!"
------------------
I have heard from one or two other players that if you receive an invitation from a property that has previously "86'd" you, that you are now free to visit the property in question. I have often wondered if an invitation from a property in such a situation has the effect of negating the 86'ing.
Tom, has your lawyer had made any comment on this point that you could share with us?
Thanks and
G'luck all,
Gamb00ler
